রবিবার, ২২ মার্চ, ২০০৯

RULING PARTY COMPLICITY IN BDR MASSACRE

VOLUME - 4, ISSUE -13, DHAKA, Bangladesh Time: 9:08:39 AM (Mon)
Blitz Online update 23 March 2009 on BDR Massacre 

EXCERPTS

Rulers turning Bangladesh into a land of panic
Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury

... There are several indications and even certain degree of evidences that a number of front-ranking politicians, mostly belonging to the ruling party were directly or indirectly involved behind the BDR Carnage. The government is under tremendous pressure from such powerful perpetrators in silently killing the investigation thus bringing out a ‘cooked-up imaginary story’ to the nation and the global community regarding the carnage. As part of such efforts and pressures, important figures in the government are continuing to give senseless statements regarding the bloody massacre. .....

... Dhaka’s front-ranking weekly newspaper, Holiday, raised several questions related to the BDR carnage of February 25-26. It said, “Why did the government not let the army follow its basic military manual and move in soon after the mutiny broke out?

“Who is the beneficiary of this decision? Why did the government allow more than 24 hours to let the rebels flee with arms and ammunitions and the properties they looted from the army officer's quarters? These are tough questions, and they will continue to beg answers for God knows how many light years. But the immediate job of the coordinator is to see that the investigators don't spend too much time on it.

“The fourth and the fifth aim of the coordination is perhaps most interesting. The fourth is to see if the entire incident could be exploited to catch some political rivals with charges of their involvement in the carnage.”

.... Meanwhile, panic generated by the ruling party and its allies in the government has put the very image of Bangladesh into deep crisis. International investments will not only decline for such panic spreading strategy, but many of the investors may even withdraw from this country. There will be severe adverse affect on country’s manpower export sector. Moreover, such propaganda will paint Bangladesh as a country under acute threat crisis from the militants. Do the members in the ruling party at least think about such negative impacts? Or, they are ready to turn Bangladesh into a land, where foreign forces will need to come for ‘combating militancy’? And, the ruling party is in this dangerous game, just for the sake of salvaging their own partymen, who plotted, conspired and collaborated the killers in February. Shame on such unpatriotic people!...


.... Sheikh Hasina’s government, instead of ensuring peace and prosperity for the people, has very successfully turned the country into a land of panic.


Everywhere is a kind of insecurity and panic. The country is under the blanket of unknown risk of terror attack. Extra security measures are already taken within the Presidential Palace, Prime Minister’s office and residence as well as National Parliament House, in fear of Islamist militant attack. Such tension and panic is increasing with the statements of the members of the government as well as some intellectuals and officials.

Newly appointed commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan Police invited Principals of all the English medium and missionary educational institutions in the Capital to alert them about possible terror attack. Subsequently, members of law enforcement agencies are deployed in most of the educational institutions, thus creating a kind of panic in the minds of the students and guardians.

“This is a terrible situation, where we have to send children to educational institutions under extreme risk”, said a concerned guardian.

Bangladeshis are already passing through very difficult time. Terrific load-shedding, water crisis, economic crisis, increase in various forms of crimes including theft, robbery, hijacking, extortion etc are making lives very complicated. ....

Although people are pushed into increased sufferings, ruling government is continuing its own-styled propaganda to convince the local and international community that, there was hands of Islamist militants behind the February 25-26 Massacre inside Bangladesh Rifles [BDR] headquarters in Dhaka, which killed more than 70 army officers.

... Home Minister, Sahara Khatun categorically told reporters on March 20, 2009 that country’s law and order situation was in the worst ever form.

Faruk Khan is the chief coordinator of the three investigation committees formed to find out facts behind the brutal massacre inside BDR headquarters. It may be mentioned here that, Bangladesh Army, government and Criminal Investigation Department [CID] are conducting separate investigations into the matter. Although Faruk Khan categorically blamed the Islamist militants and saw foreign connection behind the bloody massacre, none of the investigation committees ever endorsed such statement. Even CID, an investigation agency under Ministry of Home Affairs, categorically said that, they were yet to trace any militant connection to this massacre.

Investigators have so far arrested several mutineer BDR soldiers including a city leader of the ruling party for their involvement behind the massacre. Although nothing related to the interrogation of the arrested Awami League leader is reported to the press, some newspapers in Bangladesh are continuing to publish scoop on the investigation quoting ‘anonymous’ sources within intelligence agencies.

There is also serious confusion about the modus of trial of the killers of February 25-26 massacre .... 

Agencies quoted the minister, "We have decided to try the mutineers under court martial, as the BDR is commanded and managed by the army regulations," Shafique Ahmed, minister for Law, Justice and parliamentary affairs.

Rejecting the news in local and international media, quoting his own statement, Minister Shafiq Ahmed on March 20, 2009 said, government has not taken any decision on the modus of trial into the BDR Massacre.

He said such decision can only be taken on receipt of the investigation report. Meanwhile, chief coordinator of the investigation teams as well as Commerce Minister Faruk Khan said, investigation into the BDR Massacre issue will take much longer time.

Retired Lt. Col. Faruk Khan is continuing to give his assumptive statements on the possible figures behind the BDR Carnage. Experts opine that the probe committees are still halfway through their investigations into the February carnage. And any individual with minimum element of sanity will agree that the findings must be shrouded in confidentiality until they are finished.

Khan even told reporters that, Islamist militants have penetrated inside Bangladeshi law enforcing and disciplined forces. He repeated his assertion a week later and, to make it juicier from his party's standpoint, said proofs of some civilians with links to JMB had also been found. Most political analysts perceive it as an oblique caveat, an attempt to fudge an honest and truthful investigation, and, if one may, to let the real culprits off the hook. Even his colleagues in the government, as well as the chief investigator, have publicly distanced themselves from Col Faruk's views. Both the LGRD Minister Syed Ashraful Islam and Law Minister Barrister Shafiq Ahmed have said it would be premature to point finger at anyone until the probes are complete. Chief Investigator Abdul Quahhar Akhond said nothing could be assumed on who was or were behind the carnage until the last piece of evidence was examined. In an enquiry like this, implications and ramifications may emerge at the last moment.

There is also question to the need to have any coordinator at all and that too in the person of a highly partisan politician like Faruk Khan. As many as five independent agencies conducted investigation into Mumbai massacre on 27 November 2008. But there was no coordinator, not to speak at all of a political coordinator.

Three agencies worked separately to get to the bottom of the World Trade Center attack issue in New York on 11 September, 2001. But there was no coordinator, not to speak of a political coordinator. Neither was any politician involved in any of those investigations. The tasks were left entirely to the specialists. Why then do you need a coordinator unless the intention is to prejudice the investigation?

Dhaka’s front-ranking weekly newspaper, Holiday, raised several questions related to the BDR carnage of February 25-26. It said, “Why did the government not let the army follow its basic military manual and move in soon after the mutiny broke out?

“Who is the beneficiary of this decision? Why did the government allow more than 24 hours to let the rebels flee with arms and ammunitions and the properties they looted from the army officer's quarters? These are tough questions, and they will continue to beg answers for God knows how many light years. But the immediate job of the coordinator is to see that the investigators don't spend too much time on it.

“The fourth and the fifth aim of the coordination is perhaps most interesting. The fourth is to see if the entire incident could be exploited to catch some political rivals with charges of their involvement in the carnage.”

Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI team, which arrived in Bangladesh to investigate the February Massacre case, said the carnage at BDR headquarters last month was a conspiracy.

The FBI agents made the observation after comparing the BDR incident with mutinies staged by military and paramilitary forces in other countries, said officials of Criminal Investigation Department [CID] after a meeting with the team.

There are several indications and even certain degree of evidences that a number of front-ranking politicians, mostly belonging to the ruling party were directly or indirectly involved behind the BDR Carnage. The government is under tremendous pressure from such powerful perpetrators in silently killing the investigation thus bringing out a ‘cooked-up imaginary story’ to the nation and the global community regarding the carnage. As part of such efforts and pressures, important figures in the government are continuing to give senseless statements regarding the bloody massacre.

Meanwhile, panic generated by the ruling party and its allies in the government has put the very image of Bangladesh into deep crisis. International investments will not only decline for such panic spreading strategy, but many of the investors may even withdraw from this country. There will be severe adverse affect on country’s manpower export sector. Moreover, such propaganda will paint Bangladesh as a country under acute threat crisis from the militants. Do the members in the ruling party at least think about such negative impacts? Or, they are ready to turn Bangladesh into a land, where foreign forces will need to come for ‘combating militancy’? And, the ruling party is in this dangerous game, just for the sake of salvaging their own partymen, who plotted, conspired and collaborated the killers in February. Shame on such unpatriotic people!


Militancy link
Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury

...Commerce Minister, retired Lieutenant Colonel Faruk Khan told reporters that militants penetrated into country’s border security forces, who were liable for February Massacre that took place at the headquarters of the Bangladesh Riffles [BDR] killing large number of army officers, rape and physical abuse of several people. The minister claimed, Islamist militancy group JMB had hands behind the entire conspiracy centering February Massacre. But, Law Minister, Barrister Shafiq Ahmed rejected the comments of the Commerce Minister saying, “It will not be proper to accuse anybody until a full investigation report is available. On conclusion of the investigation, the names of persons involved will be made public.” ....

Retired Lt. Col. Faruk Khan on Monday reaffirmed his previous comment of militant connection with the February Massacre inside BDR headquarters, who once again claimed that militants have penetrated inside law enforcing and other disciplined forces in the country. .....

It is believed that, recent statements of Bangladeshi ministers on militant penetration in law enforcing agencies as well as disciplined forces may greatly hamper participation of Bangladeshi army and police in the United Nations Peace Keeping Forces [UNPKF]. . .....

Meanwhile, according to an information some vested interest groups are already active cashing the statements of the Bangladeshi minister in creating problems for Bangladeshi Forces in the United Nations Peace Keeping Force.


UN asked to return Bangladeshi forces
Blitz Exclusive

United Nations [UN] has been asked to send back members of Bangladesh Armed Forces and police from the United Nations Peace Keeping Forces [UNPKF].

According to information, one Susan Ramgopalan sent letters to the Secretary General and other officials of United Nations on March 15, 2009 titled ‘Islamist inside UN Peace Keeping Force’, where she referring to the recent statement by Bangladeshi Commerce Minister, Lt. Col. [Retired] Faruk Khan, requested the UN Secretary General to send back all the participating members of Bangladesh Armed Forces and Police in the UNPKF for possible militancy connections.

In the letter, Susan Ramgopalan said, “It has come to my attention that one of the front ranking leaders in Bangladesh’s ruling party, Awami League, member of the Cabinet and Member of Parliament, Lt. Col. Faruk Khan recently told reporters that Islamist militants like Jamiatul Mujuhidin (JMB) has penetrated into country’s border security forces.

”It is noteworthy that officers of border security forces are deputed from country’s armed forces. Under such authoritative statement from a senior member of the Bangladesh government, it is greatly assumed that there are unknown number of Islamist militants even within the other disciplined forces, including army and police.

”United Nations had been welcoming members of Bangladesh Armed Forces and Police for quite some time. But, after the latest statement from the government side, the question of security of continuing services of such elements with militancy ties would not only jeopardize the safety and security of the countries of their activities, but it may even give the militancy linked members of Bangladesh Armed Forces and Police in staging various forms of sabotaging activities in the foreign countries.

”Under such situation, further recruitment of Bangladeshi forces both from army and police should be stopped while an immediate scrutiny should begin to identify the militancy linked members of Bangladesh Armed Forces and Police inside United Nations Peace Keeping Forces and be immediately expelled from such sensitive task.”

It is also learnt that, anti-Bangladesh quarters are actively trying to press forward the issue of militant connection of Bangladesh Armed Forces, Police and other disciplined forces, with the motive of tarnishing the image of the country. They [vested quarters] get specific prove in favor of their allegation, as the Commerce Minister in Bangladesh has repeatedly told this matter to the media as well as some other ministers are also echoing the same information. 

“This is a dangerous trend, which will project Bangladesh as a Taliban state to the international community”, said a counter-terrorism experts commenting on the statement of the commerce minister and other members of the present government.





Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:39:41 +0600
Subject: Playing the militant card
From: Human Rights Forum

AMERICAN CHRONICLE
Sunday, March 22, 2009 8:18:24 PM 

Playing the militant card
Sunita Paul 
March 21, 2009

Commerce Minister in Bangladesh and the chief coordinator of the probe committees formed to investigate the bloody massacre, which took place inside Bangladesh Riffles (BDR) headquarters in Dhaka, once again told reporters on Saturday (March 21, 2009) that, the investigators have found ´militant connection´ with the brutal murder and massacre inside the BDR headquarters. Although the influential minister in the government is continuing to pass pre-judice comments on the carnage, chief investigator with Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Abdul Kahar Akhond categorically told reporters that, they are yet to find any militant connection into February´s mutiny.

It is a big question in the minds of the people as to why Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her government is allowing Faruk Khan in giving such statements, which not only will create confusion about the sincerity of the government in properly investigating this most sensitive and important case, but also create doubts as to whether the government is pressing the investigators in putting liability on the unseen militants thus clearing all the potential suspects who hold important positions in the ruling party. The answer is very simple! Sheikh Hasina is allowing Faruk Khan to give statements, as this is the last resource for the ruling party in salvaging from a possible disaster, when it will be learnt that the massacre was planned and patronized by a number of important people, who belong to the ruling party. It was already mentioned that, at least 15 Awami League and ruling Grand Alliance leaders are already targeted as suspects.

While Bangladeshi media quoted Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), who came from United States to help in investigating the case, said, FBI found the February carnage in Dhaka to be pre-planned. Neither the CID chief nor the investigating officer knows anything about the statements attributed to the FBI agents by several newspapers in Bangladesh. 

Criminal Investigation Department (CID) may take up to three months more to conclude their work as they face an unprecedented task of dealing with thousands of witnesses, according to a press report. 

The source, who is familiar with the CID investigation process and cannot be named for obvious reasons, says the time will be spent in quizzing witnesses, collecting and analyzing finger prints, corroborating video footages and examining evidence in preparation of the charge sheet. 

"It is quite a job to find out the guilty ones from 7,000 people, many of whom could be innocent," the source said. 

The source pointed out that the number of "direct eye witnesses" was more than 5,000. 

"This is the first time CID is investigating a case of this magnitude," said the source. "The number of suspected perpetrators is over a thousand." 

Several CID teams, including ones outside Dhaka, have been working, but "the nature and scope of the work may take another 90 days". 

For example, weapons and finger prints have been collected from various locations. "You have to match these with finger prints of at least 1,500 suspects." 

So, the source says, it would be impossible to come up with a report of any substance "if we are pressed to do it tomorrow". 

The CID investigators are questioning not only the suspects, but also the surviving army officers and the families. 

The CID, being the main investigator, alone is working to collect the evidence and build a case for prosecution in a court of law. "But since there are three inquiries being conducted, there'll be little scope for mistakes." 

Some police officers in CID revealed that a restriction had now been imposed on all CID officers' talking to the media. It was not immediately known as to why the ruling government imposed restrictions on CID, while their party men were allowed to make comments on the investigation.

Some analysts feel that, the reason behind imposing restrictions on CID could be because they [CID investigators] were always rejecting the statement of Faruk Khan of militant connection or foreign connection etc behind the February carnage.

Faruk Khan, an ex-army man is one of the most over-ambitious politicians in Bangladesh, who aspires of becoming the next number one figure in Bangladesh Awami League. 

In a paid blog site of Faruk Khan (www. faruqhan.blogspot.com), he is portrayed as ´Next Generation Leader of Bangladesh´. In this blog, Bangladesh´s founding father Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman´s photograph is placed in a manner, which would give an impression to the people that, Khan is a much greater leader than Sheikh Mujib. In the blog, Faruk Khan also proclaims himself to be an ´excellent personality´. If someone will visit this blog, they will possibly draw a conclusion that, in reality this man might be mentally insane, if not otherwise. And most importantly, in this blog, Faruk Khan simply ignored placing any portrait of Sheikh Hasina, to give a false impression to the people that he is ´THE ONE´ after Mujib.

In the blog, it is written, "Colonel (retd) Muhammad Faruk Khan is the Next Generation Leader of Bangladesh. The Leader of the Next Generation of Bangladesh Muhammad Faruk Khan is a Bangladeshi politician and current Commerce Minister of Bangladesh Government. Khan is a Parliament member of Bangladesh Government and the current Commerce & Industry Secretary of Awami League. Faruk Khan, A name of excellent personality of Bangladesh, He is the probable future President of Bangladesh Awami League. He is able take responsibilities as future president of Awami league, really he is "The Leader of the Next Generation of Bangladesh". He elected from one sit of Gopalgonj -01 with 99% vote as a third times at December 29, 2008's National Election. He is a retired Colonel of Bangladesh Army, he has excellent personality, good experience and lot of love for Bangladeshi's poor peoples. Khan was Born in Dhaka on September 18 in 1951, appointed Commerce Minister Col (retd) Faruk Khan was elected lawmaker for three times in a row since the 7th parliamentary elections in 1996.Col Faruk started his professional life as a commissioned officer in the then Pakistan Army. He completed his graduation from Pakistan Military Academy and masters in Defense Studies from Defense Services and Staff College in Mirpur. He also received higher education in defense related subjects from the United States. Mr. Khan worked as a member of the parliamentary standing committees on government institutions affairs and youth and sports ministry. He pledged to the people that he would protect Vatiapara riverbank area and construct a bridge at Kalna which would ease the road link from Dhaka to Khulna and Mongla. Muhammad Faruk Khan happily married to Nilufer Faruk Khan. Nilufer Faruk Khan is a social worker, she involve in various types of social works at rural level of Gopalgonj district. They are blessed with two daughters Qantara K Khan (Mumu) and Qareena K Khan (Jhumu)."


Questions here:

1. Why Faruk Khan proclaims himself as a former Colonel? According to facts, he is a retired Lieutenant Colonel.

2. How he claims to be the next probable president of Awami League? Who gave him such mandate?

3. He claims to be secured 99 per cent vote from his constituency during December 29, 2008 General Election in Bangladesh. I don´t know, if this is a fact.

Any Bangladeshi, considering him or her to be greater than Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman is a sure duffer and idiot. And how Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina can afford to live with such idiots in her team? She might be feeling delighted in seeing her own man Faruk Khan very successfully creating confusions about the investigations into the BDR Carnage. But, does she ever even think, what would be the ultimate consequence of such attitude? Moreover, does she ever think, what will happen if her ´Playing Militant Card´ plan will face a nose dive in near future? 


Sunita Paul was born in 1952 in an affluent family in Kochin, India. She obtained her twice Masters in Political Science and journalism. Later she worked with a number of research institutions and started writing for nuemrous newspapers and periodicals in India and overseas. In recent times, her works have appeared in Sunday Ledger, African Times, Global Politician, Jerusalem Post, Women's World, Insight Magazine, Europe Post, The Asian Tribune, Countercurrents, American Thinker, Intelligence Reporteur etc.


শনিবার, ২১ মার্চ, ২০০৯

Rulers turning Bangladesh into a land of panic

 Blitz On-line 

www.weeklyblitz.net E-mail: ediblitz@yahoo.com  
VOLUME - 4, ISSUE -13, DHAKA, MARCH 18, 2009 Bangladesh Time: 2:51:57 PM (Sat)Online Weeklyblitz.net

Rulers turning Bangladesh into a land of panic
Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury

When Sheikh Hasina [the present Prime Minister, who was elected through a landslide victory in December 29, 2008 general election] announced her electoral manifesto titled ‘Vision 2021 – Changing the days’, people of Bangladesh, once again thought, this time, possibly, the daughter of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman might be having a real charisma for the nation as she might also have learnt some lesson during two-year’s interim government rule, which pushed her inside prison on series of corruption charges. But, gradually aspiration, dream and hope of the people of Bangladeshi are getting faded, when Sheikh Hasina’s government, instead of ensuring peace and prosperity for the people, has very successfully turned the country into a land of panic.

Everywhere is a kind of insecurity and panic. The country is under the blanket of unknown risk of terror attack. Extra security measures are already taken within the Presidential Palace, Prime Minister’s office and residence as well as National Parliament House, in fear of Islamist militant attack. Such tension and panic is increasing with the statements of the members of the government as well as some intellectuals and officials.

Newly appointed commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan Police invited Principals of all the English medium and missionary educational institutions in the Capital to alert them about possible terror attack. Subsequently, members of law enforcement agencies are deployed in most of the educational institutions, thus creating a kind of panic in the minds of the students and guardians.

“This is a terrible situation, where we have to send children to educational institutions under extreme risk”, said a concerned guardian.

Bangladeshis are already passing through very difficult time. Terrific load-shedding, water crisis, economic crisis, increase in various forms of crimes including theft, robbery, hijacking, extortion etc are making lives very complicated. And, now the latest episode of attack fear, will surely add to the sufferings and agonies of the people of Bangladesh.

Although people are pushed into increased sufferings, ruling government is continuing its own-styled propaganda to convince the local and international community that, there was hands of Islamist militants behind the February 25-26 Massacre inside Bangladesh Rifles [BDR] headquarters in Dhaka, which killed more than 70 army officers.

Commerce Minister, Lt. Col [Retired] Faruk Khan is leading such campaign while others are also joining this notion. Home Minister, Sahara Khatun categorically told reporters on March 20, 2009 that country’s law and order situation was in the worst ever form.

Faruk Khan is the chief coordinator of the three investigation committees formed to find out facts behind the brutal massacre inside BDR headquarters. It may be mentioned here that, Bangladesh Army, government and Criminal Investigation Department [CID] are conducting separate investigations into the matter. Although Faruk Khan categorically blamed the Islamist militants and saw foreign connection behind the bloody massacre, none of the investigation committees ever endorsed such statement. Even CID, an investigation agency under Ministry of Home Affairs, categorically said that, they were yet to trace any militant connection to this massacre.

Investigators have so far arrested several mutineer BDR soldiers including a city leader of the ruling party for their involvement behind the massacre. Although nothing related to the interrogation of the arrested Awami League leader is reported to the press, some newspapers in Bangladesh are continuing to publish scoop on the investigation quoting ‘anonymous’ sources within intelligence agencies.

There is also serious confusion about the modus of trial of the killers of February 25-26 massacre and their collaborators in Bangladesh. On March 19, 2009, local and international news media published news stating that these people will be tried in court martial. 

Agencies quoted the minister, "We have decided to try the mutineers under court martial, as the BDR is commanded and managed by the army regulations," Shafique Ahmed, minister for Law, Justice and parliamentary affairs.

Rejecting the news in local and international media, quoting his own statement, Minister Shafiq Ahmed on March 20, 2009 said, government has not taken any decision on the modus of trial into the BDR Massacre.

He said such decision can only be taken on receipt of the investigation report. Meanwhile, chief coordinator of the investigation teams as well as Commerce Minister Faruk Khan said, investigation into the BDR Massacre issue will take much longer time.

Retired Lt. Col. Faruk Khan is continuing to give his assumptive statements on the possible figures behind the BDR Carnage. Experts opine that the probe committees are still halfway through their investigations into the February carnage. And any individual with minimum element of sanity will agree that the findings must be shrouded in confidentiality until they are finished.

Khan even told reporters that, Islamist militants have penetrated inside Bangladeshi law enforcing and disciplined forces. He repeated his assertion a week later and, to make it juicier from his party's standpoint, said proofs of some civilians with links to JMB had also been found. Most political analysts perceive it as an oblique caveat, an attempt to fudge an honest and truthful investigation, and, if one may, to let the real culprits off the hook. Even his colleagues in the government, as well as the chief investigator, have publicly distanced themselves from Col Faruk's views. Both the LGRD Minister Syed Ashraful Islam and Law Minister Barrister Shafiq Ahmed have said it would be premature to point finger at anyone until the probes are complete. Chief Investigator Abdul Quahhar Akhond said nothing could be assumed on who was or were behind the carnage until the last piece of evidence was examined. In an enquiry like this, implications and ramifications may emerge at the last moment.

There is also question to the need to have any coordinator at all and that too in the person of a highly partisan politician like Faruk Khan. As many as five independent agencies conducted investigation into Mumbai massacre on 27 November 2008. But there was no coordinator, not to speak at all of a political coordinator.

Three agencies worked separately to get to the bottom of the World Trade Center attack issue in New York on 11 September, 2001. But there was no coordinator, not to speak of a political coordinator. Neither was any politician involved in any of those investigations. The tasks were left entirely to the specialists. Why then do you need a coordinator unless the intention is to prejudice the investigation?

Dhaka’s front-ranking weekly newspaper, Holiday, raised several questions related to the BDR carnage of February 25-26. It said, “Why did the government not let the army follow its basic military manual and move in soon after the mutiny broke out?

“Who is the beneficiary of this decision? Why did the government allow more than 24 hours to let the rebels flee with arms and ammunitions and the properties they looted from the army officer's quarters? These are tough questions, and they will continue to beg answers for God knows how many light years. But the immediate job of the coordinator is to see that the investigators don't spend too much time on it.

“The fourth and the fifth aim of the coordination is perhaps most interesting. The fourth is to see if the entire incident could be exploited to catch some political rivals with charges of their involvement in the carnage.”

Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI team, which arrived in Bangladesh to investigate the February Massacre case, said the carnage at BDR headquarters last month was a conspiracy.

The FBI agents made the observation after comparing the BDR incident with mutinies staged by military and paramilitary forces in other countries, said officials of Criminal Investigation Department [CID] after a meeting with the team.

There are several indications and even certain degree of evidences that a number of front-ranking politicians, mostly belonging to the ruling party were directly or indirectly involved behind the BDR Carnage. The government is under tremendous pressure from such powerful perpetrators in silently killing the investigation thus bringing out a ‘cooked-up imaginary story’ to the nation and the global community regarding the carnage. As part of such efforts and pressures, important figures in the government are continuing to give senseless statements regarding the bloody massacre.

Meanwhile, panic generated by the ruling party and its allies in the government has put the very image of Bangladesh into deep crisis. International investments will not only decline for such panic spreading strategy, but many of the investors may even withdraw from this country. There will be severe adverse affect on country’s manpower export sector. Moreover, such propaganda will paint Bangladesh as a country under acute threat crisis from the militants. Do the members in the ruling party at least think about such negative impacts? Or, they are ready to turn Bangladesh into a land, where foreign forces will need to come for ‘combating militancy’? And, the ruling party is in this dangerous game, just for the sake of salvaging their own partymen, who plotted, conspired and collaborated the killers in February. Shame on such unpatriotic people!

AMERICAN CHRONICLE : Leaving Crocodile tear for the killers in Bangladesh

Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:38:25 +0600
Subject: Leaving Crocodile tear for the killers in Bangladesh
From: Human Rights Forum
To: feedback@pmo.gov.bd, fs@mofabd.org
Cc: Chief Editor BSS , unb_news@yahoo.com


AMERICAN CHRONICLE

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/95135

Leaving Crocodile tear for the killers in Bangladesh
Sunita Paul 

March 19, 2009 

Human Rights Watch (HRW), a New York City based non-governmental organization, which sent a letter to Bangladeshi Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina Wajed only few weeks back with the plea of dismantling Forces Intelligences of Bangladesh Armed Forces, has issued a fresh statement on the February Massacre, which took place inside Bangladesh Riffles (border security guards) headquarters in Dhaka, killing large number of Army officers, thus leaving numerous wounded and abused.


According to international news media, United States based Human Rights Watch urged Bangladesh's new democratically elected government on March 19, 2009 to end human rights abuses, saying there was widespread torture and intimidation in the country.

"The human rights situation in Bangladesh is poor. There is widespread torture and security agencies get away with murders, tortures and intimidations ... there is a culture of impunity that must be ended," Brad Adams, Asia director for Human Rights Watch, told a news conference.

"We expect the new government to keep its promises to address all these problems and this is what Bangladeshi voters expect."

Hasina told parliament recently that "Suggestions and opinions of the rights organizations will be duly incorporated in the government policy to uphold human rights."

Earlier on the day, Bangladesh government announced that it will hold court martial for paramilitary border guards involved in a mutiny last month in which more than 80 people were brutally murdered.

Nearly 200 members of the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) have been detained for the revolt over wages that began on Feb. 25 at the headquarters of the paramilitary force in Dhaka and then spread to a dozen other towns.

"We have decided to try the mutineers under court martial, as the BDR is commanded and managed by the army regulations," Shafique Ahmed, minister for Law, Justice and parliamentary affairs told reporters.

"It will be ensure justice," he said.

The revolt, which lasted 33 hours and ended after the rebels laid down their arms, stoked concerns over the stability of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's two-month-old civilian government.

Meanwhile, already controversial minister in the present government, who earlier said that militants have penetrated into Bangladesh´s law enforcing agencies and disciplined forces, told reporters on March 19, 2009 that the trial procedure of the BDR mutiny case will be the "speediest one possible".

Before I discuss the untold mystery of the sudden enthusiasm of Human Rights Watch, let me give here one more important fact.

Bangladeshi government has asked a team of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) working in its capital Dhaka to help uncover any foreign links to last month's border guards mutiny. Guess who made such request! Yes, absolutely, it is none but the same Lt. Col. Faruk Khan. Experts opining on this specific request from the Bangladeshi authorities said, does the government want FBI to investigate foreign links or discover foreign link? Some even believe that, government must be inclined in using FBI in painting an imaginary foreign link story. It is even learnt from valid sources that, Bangladeshi authorities have requested FBI and other foreign investigators in identifying possible militant link to this sordid Massacre.

7-member FBI team is now in Dhaka, while a team of the Scotland Yard of the United Kingdom also came to Bangladesh to help probe into the last month's BDR carnage.


Again, let us get back to the HRW issue. Prior to sending their representative to Bangladesh only a couple of days back, this group had series of meetings with a number of important players in the ruling party in United States, including the son of the present Prime Minister. It was reported that Sajib Wajed Joy, who lives in United States for years, proclaims to be the advisor to his mother, Prime Minister Hasina Wajed.

Sajib had been extremely vocal against Bangladesh Armed Forces and he was interviewed or quoted in a number of influential medias in the worlds. Joy has close ties with several think-tanks in United States and reportedly hired one of such think-tank cum lobbyist group in continuing massive propaganda and persuation against DGFI (Directorate General of Forces Intelligence), Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), Bangladesh Army and army´s involvement in politics. Since the February Massacre in Dhaka in February, 2009, Sajib Wajed Joy repeatedly said that, the murders and mutiny inside the Bangladesh Riffles headquarters took place due to corruption of BDR officers (army officers on deputation), pressure upon BDR soldiers by the armymen and huge difference of facilities and other benefits of Bangladesh Army and the Bangladesh Riffles.

As part of Joy´s anti-army propaganda, a number of international groups were hired to intervene into the February Massacre issue. HRW´s latest statement might have certain links to such efforts of Joy. Moreover, many of the front-ranking Awami League leaders were directly or indirectly involved behind the BDR Mutiny. Meanwhile, two of the most controversial figures, whose names came at the front right after the mutiny, Jahangir Kabir Nanak (present a state minister for local government ministry) and Mirza Azam (ruling party´s whip in the parliament), have suddenly disappread from the media. It is even reported that, both were ready to flee the country, once the investigation reports were already done. Investigators so far have identified more than 15 Awami League and 8 BNP men held responsible for patronizing or instigating or funding the mutiny. Another city leader of the ruling party named Torab Ali Akhand (who earlier served in BDR) is already being grilled by investigation agencies after arrest. Akhand already mentioned names of a few influential Awami League leaders, including a close relative of the Prime Minister as his patron in the bloody mutiny. He also told interrogators that a few dozens of arms and thousands of round of ammunitions as well as ´some´ Arges grenades were taken from him by some leaders of Bangladesh Chatra League (Student´s front of the ruling party) and Jubo League (youth front of the ruling party). Torab was the custodian of looted arms, ammunitions and explosives from BDR headquarters after the mutiny. He also, at the instruction of an influential Awami League leader brought out prossession in favor of the mutiny to give encouragement to the mutineers.

What happened in Dhaka during February 25-26 is unimazinable and intollerable. But, what is happening now is even worst. An elected government in Dhaka is rather active in salvaging the killers and their patrons instead of ensuring proper investigation and trial. On the other hand, it is also learnt that, investigations are unnecessarily delayed and interfeared by the influential members of the governmemt. 

Bangladesh: February Massacre & Operation Rebel Hunt

Wednesday, March 18, 2009 
GLOBAL POLITICIAN
Home >> South Asia >> India, Pakistan & Bangladesh


Bangladesh: February Massacre & Operation Rebel Hunt 

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury - 3/18/2009

Members of Armed Forces are called by the government, which will come into effect from Monday morning to nab each and every rebel, their instigators and patrons, who were behind the February Massacre, killing more than 135 heroic officers of Bangladesh Army as well as their friends and family members. Experts opine that, Bangladesh Army has complete sympathy and support of the people of Bangladesh in nabbing the culprits. The entire nation is heavy with shock and pain. They want to see trial of the killers and their perpetrators without wasting even a second.

Meanwhile, several days have now passed since the siege laid to the Bangladesh Rifles headquarters was brought to an end and yet, the nation is unable to draw a line under the bloody massacre that was carried out there by a section of murderous troops on February 25 and 26.

To begin with, the nation is yet to learn the full extent of the carnage, given that the whereabouts of many army officers are still unknown. And second, they still do not know why or how this brutal massacre was carried out, who were behind it, and what their motives were. In order to move forward, therefore, the entire nation must not only understand the full extent of the crimes committed and punish those responsible for such barbaric acts, it is also extremely important to find the answers to the many questions that plague the public mind.

Bangladesh while mourns this tragedy, the nation reiterate its demand for justice for those who were slain. The government has a responsibility to thoroughly investigate, properly try and punish those responsible.

With the beginning of Operation Rebel Hunt, several newspapers in Bangladesh have started giving scoops of the crime, while some senseless newspapers are yet engaged in spreading misleading information thus showing sympathy towards the killers.

Bangladesh’s influential vernacular daily Manabzamin published a very comprehensive and exclusive report saying investigators are listening to recorded telephonic conversations of various people with the killers during and before the Massacre. The newspaper said, one of the kingpins of the brutality, deputy assistant director of Bangladesh Riffles, Towhid’s mobile phone call records are already being checked by various intelligence agencies.

Call list of some media members are also being checked as they too had several correspondence and conversations with the killer troops. Manabzamin said, several points are being already under serious investigation by various intelligence agencies. The investigators are mainly putting focus on the following points:



1. After learning about the incident, why the government did not allow army to go into operations,

2. Why time was wasted in the name of political settlement,

3. Why the risk of lives of 168 army officers were not considered with due importance,

4. Some politicians belonging to the ruling party tried to waste time in the name of political settlement. Jahangir Kabir Nanak, Mirza Azam and a number of important figures in the ruling party are already in the list of such elements,

5. Why the government waited till 1:00 pm although they knew about the incident sometime before 10:00 am in taking minimum initiatives in resolving the crisis,

6. How the derailed killers were able to give interview to a particular television channel,

7. While none could enter, how media managed to enter and collect anti-army propaganda materials from the culprits,

8. Why the Home Minister did not visit the spot immediately after the incident,

9. What was the topic of conversation between the mutineers and government’s delegation Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza Azam,

10. Who took Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza Azam inside the BDR headquarters,

11. How the mutineers were taken in luxurious government vehicles [with black tinted glass] to the Prime Minister,

12. Why the mutineers taken to Prime Minister were not properly dressed [they did not have belt and cap],

13. Why these mutineers were not asked about the whereabouts of the director general before their meeting with the Prime Minister,

14. Why the mutineers gave false information to the Prime Minister such as, the hostages are in safe custody and there are 15,000 mutineer troops inside the BDR headquarters [there is information that the real number of troops inside were not more than five thousand. In this case, investigators are questioning about the identity of the remaining 10,000 people. They are having doubts as to whether these 10,000 were hired goons and culprits from outside in uniform],

15. Who helped the mutineers in escaping,

16. Who seized the power connection at Pilkhana BDR headquarters thus making way for the culprits to flee,

17. Some of the released officers have told that, killers continued to kill the army officers in phases. Many were killed after the declaration of general amnesty and during negotiation with the government,

18. Why the government did not set a pre-condition of giving general amnesty in exchange of release of all the hostages inside the BDR headquarters,

19. How the 14 members of the negotiation team, who went to the Prime Minister were selected. Who selected them,


20. Why the negotiators on behalf of the government never tried to know the whereabouts of the held officers and their family members,

21. Why dead bodies of the killed officers were not demanded prior to any negotiation,

22. The investigators are also investigating a fact that, while massacre was continuing inside the BDR headquarters, one army officer was engaged in sending fax messages to various people in support of mutineers and alleging the director general [my newspaper, Weekly Blitz has investigated this matter and learnt that one officer in the rank of Lieutenant Colonel sent such messages. This officer communicated with a large number of people who are aligned with the ruling party],

23. Wherefrom red and yellow bandanas and masks were taken inside the BDR headquarters,

24. One of the escaped officers gave extensive information on how the incident was taking place. He also claims that he was hidden inside a house. In this case, question is, how he managed to witness the entire happenings in the BDR compound when he was hiding under a bed,

25. This officer also said that, in the room where he was hiding, he was also watching the television and listened to the address of the Prime Minister. Here the investigators are curious to know, how for a man, whose life is in danger can afford to see the television,

26. Another escaped officer [a Major] told in an interview that, he wad hiding above the false ceiling of Darbar Hall. He also described that, during the entire Massacre, he moved from one place to another, thus finally coming back to the ceiling. Question here is how he managed to escape the eyes of thousands of mutineers and killers. Secondly he said, while hiding in the ceiling, he heard someone calling his name in the megaphone. He pepped through the holes of the ceiling and found Mirza Azam there. Here the investigators are curious to know, as to how Mirza Azam was sure about this officer’s hiding place.

27. The investigators are also trying to understand as to why the Prime Minister was hurriedly shifted from her personal residence to State Guest House in the name of security lacking,

28. A foreign intelligence agency suggested the Prime Minister to shift quickly to the secured State Guest House hurriedly. Investigators are also trying to find out motive behind such message of that foreign intelligence agency,

29. The investigators are also trying to find out as to why any responsible minister of the government did not rush to the spot, where dead bodies of army officers were recovered from a sewage line,

30. State Minister for Law Affairs told reporters much before the surrender of arms that fifty army officers were killed in the Massacre. Wherefrom the State Minister got this figure and if they demanded the dead bodies of these 50 officers.

Meanwhile, my newspaper, Weekly Blitz also found several unresolved question centering this tragic massacre:

1. Prime Minister told the Parliament that director general of Bangladesh Rifles phoned her right after the outbreak of the mutiny and sought her help. She further said, much ahead of this call, between 9:26-9:30 in the morning, the Prime Minister came to know about the mutiny inside BDR headquarters. She called the army chief and asked how long it would take for sending troops. The army chief told her that 90-120 minutes will be required for going into action. She [Prime Minister] asked for sending Air Force Helicopters urgently. The Prime Minister said, Rapid Action Battalion failed to go into action immediately as they were reportedly caught into traffic jam. She said all murders took place between 10-11 am on the first day of the massacre. Many of the officers, who were hiding sent text message saying they and their family members will be murdered if army was sent into action.

Here is my first question! Who are those officers sending text messages asking to stop army actions? And, how the Prime Minister is sure that all the murders took place during 10-11 am? According to statements of a number of escaped officers, murders continued even during the second day of the massacre. Definitely, one party here is giving untrue information. It is important to identify the fact.

2. Former President and army chief, Hussain Muhammed Ershad in an interview to private television channels said, only 20 minutes were required to combat the mutiny by the Bangladesh Army. There is no doubt that, General Ershad has extensive knowledge about the strength of Bangladesh Army. In this case, taking his statement into consideration, there could be a serious question as to why the politicians were interested in wasting time in the name of negotiations instead of military offensives,

3. Former director general of Bangladesh Rifles, Major General [Retired] Fazlur Rahman told reporters that hundreds of army officers were murdered inside BDR headquarters under the garb of mutiny. He said, should the Prime Minister go for quick military actions, lives of many officers would have been saved as well many of their family members would also have been saved from being raped and tortured. Citing example of 1995 mutiny of Ansars, General Rahman said, when only one mutineer Ansar member was shot during offensives, all the remaining mutineers immediately surrendered arms.

Here is again my comment again. From the statements of both the Generals, it is evident that, immediate and very quick army actions would have definitely saved the lives of many of the officers of our Armed Forces. Although the ruling government is trying its best to justify the ‘success’ through political negotiation, I can well anticipate and apprehend that, some vested interest group was very much inclined in seeing most of the officers inside the Bangladesh Rifles headquarters, murdered.

According to various information, at the first hour of the mutiny, 30-35 officers, including the Director General of Bangladesh Rifles were killed. On Wednesday, after announcement of General Amnesty by the Prime Minister, almost the same number of officers was killed in the second batch. And, during the midnight of Wednesday, remaining officers were killed, one-by-one as per list available with the killers inside the BDR headquarters. Two full magazine bullets were shot in the bodies of each of the murdered officers. Some were even shot through their mouth. Poisoned bayonets were also charged on the dead bodies to confirm the death. Taking the advantage of darkness inside the compound, several mass graves were erected and dead bodies were gradually dumped in at various places inside the BDR quarters. Some dead bodies were also burnt.

Meanwhile, according to reports, Bangladesh government has sought assistance from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, US intelligence agency, for probe into the incident of BDR revolt in Dhaka on Wednesday to bring the culprits to book and unveil the plot behind the massacre.

Prime minister Sheikh Hasina sought the FBI help when American assistant secretary of state for the South and Central Asian Affairs, Richard Boucher, talked to her over phone on Sunday morning, on behalf of the secretary of state, Hilary Rodham Clinton, extending the US support at this trying time.

Boucher, on behalf of the US government, extended a continued support to the government and people of Bangladesh, and called for national unity as Washington responded to the tragic aftermath of the BDR rebellion.

Over 1,000 BDR soldiers were sued on Sunday for rising up against their officers, from the army, in the Bangladesh Rifles Headquarters in Dhaka in February 25–26. 

The plaintiff in the first information report named four junior BDR officials ­ deputy assistant directors Tahidul Alam, Nasir Uddin Khan, Mirza Habibur Rahman and Abdul Jalil and soldiers Abdur Rahim and Mohammad Selim to have led the rebellion.

The case has been lodged under 24 sections of the Penal Code accusing the BDR soldiers of hatching a criminal conspiracy, waging or attempting to wage a war against the state, rioting, murder, voluntarily causing grievous hurt to deter public servants from duties, assaulting or using criminal force to deter public servant from discharging duties, committing wrongful confinement, setting fire or using explosive substance with intent to destroy houses, theft after preparations made for causing death, hurt or restraint, and causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offenders. Section 149 of the Penal Code was also applied to the case which stipulates every member of an unlawful assembly will be guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object.

The rebels, who concealed the bodies of the army officers and their relatives, were further accused of hostage taking and attempting to dispose of the bodies of their victims by setting fire, burying them in mass graves and dumping them into sewers, according to the complaint.

Names and designations of 48 army officers have so far been found are:

Major General Shakil Ahmed, Brigadier General Mohammad Abdul Bari, Colonel Nafiz Uddin Ahmed, Colonel Mohammad Mazibul Haque, Colonel Mohammad Anisuzzaman, Colonel Mohammad Mashiur Rahman, Colonel Qudrat Elahi Rahman Shafique, Colonel Mohammad Akhtar Hossain, Colonel Mohammad Rezaul Kabir, Colonel Kazi Emdadul Haque, Colonel BM Zahid Hossain, Colonel Shamsul Arefin Ahmmed, Colonel Mohammad Naqibur Rahaman, Colonel Mohammad Zakir Hossain, Colonel Kazi Moazzem Hossain, Colonel Gulzar Uddin Ahmed, Colonel Mohammad Shawkat Imam, Colonel Mohammad Imdadul Islam, Colonel Mohammad Aftabul Islam, Lieutenant Colonel Mohammad Badrul Huda, Lieutenant Colonel Mohammad Enayetul Haque, Lieutenant Colonel Abu Musa Mohammad Ayub Kaiser, Lieutenant Colonel Mohammad Saiful Islam, Lieutenant Colonel Mohammad Sajjadur Rahman, Lieutenant Colonel Mohammad Lutfur Rahman, Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibn Amin, Lieutenant Colonel Shamsul Azam, Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Khan, Lieutenant Colonel Kazi Rabi Rahman, Major Mohammad Azharul Islam, Major Mohammad Abdus Salam Khan, Major Mohammad Saleh, Major Mahmud Hasan, Major SM Mamunur Rahman, Major Humayun Haider, Major Khalid Hossain, Major Mahmudul Hasan, Major Mohammad Mizanur Rahman, Major Mohammad Maksum ul Hakim, Major Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain, Major Mohammad Mominul Islam, Major Mushtaq Mahmud, Major Mostafa Asdaduzzaman, Major Kazi Mosaddek Hossain, Captain Mohammad Mazharul Haider and Lieutenant Colonel [Retired] Delwar Hossain.

Major General Shakil Ahmmed’s wife Nazneen Shakil and Lieutenant Colonel [Retired] Delwar Hossain’s wife Roushni Fatema Aktar Lovely were killed in the incident.

According to another press report, a large number of army officers on Sunday [March 1, 2009] expressed their deepest emotions, frustrations, excitement and expectations at a three-hour grand conference with Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina discussing the BDR carnage in which the nation lost at least 73 people, including 60 officers.

At the Sena Kunja auditorium of Dhaka Cantonment, around 700 to 800 officers, from the army chief to second lieutenant ranked officers, discussed with the premier from 11:30am 32 points related to the carnage.

Hasina assured the army that each and everyone of the culprits involved in slaying would be traced and tried. She said the investigation would be free and fair and she would not spare anyone, even if someone of her party is found to have links with such a heinous act.

Responding to an idea from the officers, she agreed on forming a special tribunal for trial of the culprits.

Some officers suggested that the army be given the task of "Operation Rebel Hunt" to track and arrest the mutineers efficiently.

Sources present inside the conference say some officers told the premier they were not too happy with the way the BDR mutiny was handled and they thought it could have ended earlier by mobilising the army quickly.

Hasina then asked each of them what they think she should have done, and they came forward with their suggestions. The officers added her speech delivered on Wednesday at 2:00pm, five hours after the carnage began, could have been delivered earlier to calm down the mutineers.

They added the general amnesty declared by the PM to the mutineers to bring the situation under control should have been conditional. She could have said that the amnesty would be given if they did not kill officers.

Some officers suggested that each of the families of the slain officers given a high compensation package of TK 10 Million with a flat or plot. Some others suggested that a more pragmatic approach would be awarding pensions to each of the families of the victims as per the ranks of the officers. This would provide long-term benefit, they said..

As Bangladesh Rifles' [BDR] image and moral have been shattered, it should be restructured, they said, adding BDR may be disbanded and restructured under a new name like "Bangladesh Border Guards".

If sufficient manpower cannot be provided for the new force, it may be formed in line with Rapid Action Battalion as a composite force comprising army, navy, air force and the police. They suggested that the PM make an organogram and make it functional quickly as the border needs to be guarded quickly. The PM agreed saying that the details would be worked out later.

A credible enquiry is needed so that in future other governments cannot question it. It should be participated by different groups of people to ensure neutrality.

The officers also felt aggrieved by anti-army statements made by lawmakers in parliament. "We are a force serving the nation. If a body like parliament blasts a government organ like the army, it damages the whole institution," said an officer to the PM. 

The officers also expressed their opinion that the army should be kept out of politics. Neither the Awami League, nor BNP should drag army into politics, they said.

They added transfer and promotion within the army should not be politically interfered with and left for handling professionally.

Meanwhile members of the armed forces are deployed across the country indefinitely to help law enforcement agencies arrest the absconding rebels of Bangladesh Rifles [BDR] and recover the missing firearms and ammunition.

The deployment begins on March 2, 2009 morning in aid of the civil administration under the 'Operation Rebel Hunt' mission, sources said.

The forces will be stationed at district headquarters and carry out operations on the basis of specific information from their intelligence, said sources.

As the Operation Rebel Hunt is already on from Monday morning and members of the Armed Forces are deployed throughout the country, it is expected that in the quickest possible time, killers, perpetrators and the instigators shall be identified and tried with highest punishment. Moreover, it is moral obligation of each and every citizen of Bangladesh to help the investigators with information, which might be useful in the entire investigation process. Nation demands immediate trial of the conspirators and killers of February Massacre. And this is a great testimony for the entire nation to prove to the world that, killers and conspirators, irrespective of their political identity and might, who staged such brutality of highest degree in Bangladesh, shall never be spared.

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury is the Editor & Publisher of the Weekly Blitz (www.weeklyblitz.net)

BDR Massacre : Bangladesh Khelafat Andolon Criticizes Faruq Khan's Statements to Misguide Investigations

Press Release : Monday 16 March 2009
We are Worried over Minister Faruq Khan’s senseless Statements regarding Carnage in Dhaka BDR Headquarter

STATEMENT

We are worried that Lt. Col.(Rtd.)Faruq Khan, the ruling government’s Commerce Minister and Chief Coordinator of investigations of the carnage in BDR Head Quarter, is continuing to give senseless statements which are getting wide media coverage at home and abroad. His statements on the one hand raising questions about the role of the investigators, and on the other hand the suspicion about the ruling party’s complicity in the carnage is deepening. Moreover his statements are threatening future of Bangladesh military’s participation in UN Peacekeeping missions abroad. 

Ruling party Minister Faruk Khan has palliated the absconding fugitive BDR men. In another statement he openly said that some BDR men had JMB complicity. During investigation such statements are indicative of motive to misguide the investigation. It may be noted that the list of suspects of Carnage in BDR Headquarter reported already in local and foreign media includes names of more than one leading personality of the ruling party. Moreover the appointment of an anti-military pro-Awami League ex-police officer as the Investigation Office is being counted as efforts to intentionally misguide the investigation.

Bangladesh Khelafat Andolon demands high level intelligence analysis of the statements and role of ruling party minister Faruq Khan. This is required to ensure severe punishment to the actual perpetrators and to keep the image of our military as an institution aligned with our Freedom and Sovereignty.

 
Kazi Azizul Huq
International Affairs Secretary
Bangladesh Khelafat Andolon
E-mail: khelafat@dhaka.net
Cell: 01819-407963 

New York Times : BDR Massacre - Suspicion about real and credible investigation

13-3-9 New York Times Post-Editorial

Theme : BDR Massacre - Suspicion about real and credible investigation

The New York Times

March 13, 2009

Bangladeshi Premier Faces a Grim Crucible
By SOMINI SENGUPTA


Sheikh Hasina survived when gunmen executed her father and her extended family late one summer night in 1975. She survived again when assassins hurled 13 grenades at her political rally in 2004, killing two dozen people.
 
Today, about two months into her tenure as prime minister of this fractious, poor and coup-prone country, she confronts her greatest crucible yet: an unusually savage mutiny by border guards last month that left soldiers buried in mass graves and widened the gulf between her fragile administration and the military.
Altogether, 74 people were killed, mostly army officers in command of the border force.
 
Two separate investigations are under way: one by the army, another by Mrs. Hasina’s government. Whether either will yield credible results or whether their findings will be consistent is unknown. Mrs. Hasina’s fate and the stability of the country depend on a satisfactory resolution. 
 
In an interview this week, Mrs. Hasina called the mutiny “a big conspiracy” against her agenda to establish a secular democracy in this Muslim-majority nation of 150 million. She struck a note of defiant resolve.
“No one will stop me,” she said. “I will continue.” Then she raised her eyebrows and offered a hint of a smile. “We have to unearth all these conspiracies.”
 
Mrs. Hasina, 61, has the air of a strict grandmother. She speaks softly. She wears traditional Bengali saris that cover her head. Her eyes are a cool gray.
 
She said she was keen to hunt down and punish those responsible for the mutiny. She suggested that several factions unhappy with her agenda could have been responsible, including Islamist militants, whom she has vowed to crush. 
 
“There are many elements,” she said in her first extensive interview since the Feb. 25 siege. “These terrorist groups are very much active. This incident gives us a lesson. It can happen again.”
 
After two years of army-backed rule in the country, Mrs. Hasina’s won a resounding majority of the parliamentary seats in elections last December, after campaigning on a slate of provocative promises. She said she would root out Islamist guerillas, put on trial those suspected of conspiring against Bangladesh’s independence from Pakistan in 1971, nurture friendly relations with India and stop anti-Indian insurgents from using Bangladeshi soil to launch attacks against New Delhi.
 
The election drew a turnout of around 80 percent and was cited as among the most credible and least violent here in recent years.
 
Then came the massacre.
 
On the last Wednesday in February, at the headquarters of the border patrol, known as the, a guard pointed his weapon at the force commander. Some commotion ensued, according to investigators, and then other guards stormed the hall. Gunfire could be heard blocks away. Hundreds of civilians who lived, worked and went to school inside the compound were trapped.
 
Mrs. Hasina allowed the army to take position around the compound but not to storm it. She negotiated with the mutineers for the next 36 hours, first directly and then with emissaries. She offered a general amnesty and promised to address the rebels’ grievances. On the second day, when they refused to surrender, she threatened to send in tanks. By the time the siege ended, more than 6,000 border guards had escaped, and an unknown quantity of weapons had been taken from the armory.
 
As the bodies of the dead soldiers were discovered, the horrific nature of the violence became evident. Some army officers had been shot at close range and then stabbed repeatedly with bayonets. Eyes were gouged out. A stack of 38 bodies was found in a mass grave. 
 
No sooner did the siege end than the arguments began. Today, the bitter points of contention are whether the army commanders were killed before or after negotiations began (the time of death has not yet been established for all the victims), whether Mrs. Hasina pressed to know the scale of the killings before offering amnesty, and, most important, why she did not permit the army to storm the compound early on.
 
“The government was not in charge,” said Abdur Razzak, a leader of the conservative Jamaat-e-Islami party. “This was an army problem. The army should have solved it in their wisdom.”
 
Mr. Razzak said the mutiny was a conspiracy designed “to weaken the army, to weaken the state.” Mr. Razzak’s party was trounced in the last election; its share of the 300 elected seats in Parliament fell to 2 from 17 in the December elections. 
 
Mrs. Hasina said sending in the army would have resulted in a bloodbath and risked a potential conflict between the 46 border guard battalions scattered across the country and their army commanders.
 
In any case, few in Bangladesh say they believe that the mutiny was what it first appeared: a rebellion of rank-and-file border guards aggrieved by their commanders, their pay and their working conditions. In a country where conspiracy theories are a national sport, the mutiny has become a screen onto which many anxieties are projected.
 
Some point to terrorist groups and anti-Indian insurgents. Others say that it was fueled by intelligence agencies in either India or Pakistan ­ both countries have been alternately friend and foe to Bangladesh. There are those who suggest that it could involve politicians who lost the last election, while others blame people within Mrs. Hasina’s party whose goal is to keep the army in check.
 
The truth of what happened may never be known. Bangladesh holds many mysteries in its heart, including the question of who ordered the killing of Mrs. Hasina’s father, Sheik Mujibur Rahman, a former prime minister. Mrs. Hasina was spared only because she had been visiting her husband in Europe at the time. Eighteen members of her family, including her brothers and their wives, were executed.
 
Central to Mrs. Hasina’s survival today is keeping the military on her side. Her face-off with the army came into sharp focus three days after the mutiny ended when she confronted an unusually rowdy room of army officers. They berated her for not allowing the army to take charge early on. The screaming match was recorded and put up on YouTube, shocking the nation.
 
This week, in the interview, Mrs. Hasina said she sympathized with the soldiers’ grief even as she cautioned them against taking revenge ­ or power. So far, the army does not seem interested.
 
Instead, Mrs. Hasina’s most dangerous enemies have been the Islamist militant groups that have put down roots here in recent years. They have been implicated in assassination attempts against her, including the grenade attack on her political meeting in August 2004. Mrs. Hasina lost some of her hearing as a result of that attack. Sitting under a framed portrait of her father, she said she would not be bowed.
 
“If I am afraid for my life, the whole nation will be afraid,” she said. “I know some bullets, some grenades are chasing me.”
 

Was it BDR troop mutiny?

Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:51:58 +0600
Subject: Was it BDR troop mutiny?
From: Human Rights Forum
To: "PS-1 to PM, GoB"


http://pakobserver.net/200903/04/Articles04.asp

Was it BDR troop mutiny?
Salahuddin Shoaib Ch

EXCERPTS

-To understand the conspiracy behind, we have to evaluate some facts as well some statements of several politicians and so-called intellectuals...


- red and yellow color bandana and masks were already dumped inside the toilet adjacent to Darbar Hall much ahead of the incident..

-arms and ammunitions entered the Bangladesh Riffles headquarters minutes after some derailed troops started expressing anger, in a grey color pick up [which he said, was not belonging to BDR]....


-there was a coordinated timing amongst the killers and the conspirators..

-after the general election on December 29, 2008, a large number of leaders belonging to political parties, such as Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir, Moudud Ahmed, Suranjit Sen Gupta, Mirza Abbas, Salauddin Quader Chowdhury, Abdul Jalil, Liakot Sikder, Jahangir Kabir Nanak, Mirza Azam, Sajeda Chowdhury, Khondokar Delwar Hossain, Brigadier [Retired] Hannan Shah etc., were continuing a campaign against Bangladesh Army with abusive words..

-intellectuals, mostly belonging to leftist ideology were continuing campaign against Bangladesh Army...

-Right after the outburst of the brutality inside the BDR headquarters, the director general of Bangladesh Riffles.. reportedly spoke to the chief executive of the country over cell phone and notified of the incident....

-Understanding the degree of danger, what actions the chief executive initiated immediately is yet to be known by the people of Bangladesh...

-government sent two very junior leaders and controversial figures like Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza Azam, almost a couple of hours after the brutality started..

-There was no sign of minimum wariness in the faces of both the leaders. They were rather calm! Moreover, when both were ‘allowed’ to enter the BDR headquarters, the killers were ready to send a 14-member delegation with them almost in less than 30 minutes...

-they spent 4 hours in listening to what Jahangir Kabir Nanak described, “emotional appeals of the troops”, why none had ever put focus on pressing the killer delegation to communicate a message to BDR headquarters in stopping further brutality?...

-Executed kingpin of Islamist Militancy, named Jamaatul Mujahedin Bangladesh [JMB], Shaikh Abdur Rahman is the brother-in-law of Mirza Azam....

-After the prolonged ‘meeting’ with the Prime Minister, the killer representatives, led by Deputy Assistant Director of BDR, Towhid, were allowed to waste further time in the name of speaking to the reporters...

-Jahangir Kabir Nanak told the reporters that the Prime Minister has accorded general amnesty to the ‘mutineers’ as well they [the so-called mutineers] agreed to surrender arms forthwith. But, in reality, it never happened. In this case again, why the government was ready to let the killers continue brutality and anti army campaign by using some questioned media?...

-electricity inside the premises of brutality was snatched by someone. Why the government allowed letting the area remain in dark?...

-dozens of youths were chanting slogans in favor of the killers and they even approached close to the main gate of the BDR headquarters. Some of these youths were even supplying drinking water to the killers. Here is another question.. Police was basically cordoning the entire area and was not allowing any civilian in entering the spot. In this case, how these youths were allowed to enter, chant slogan and even supply drinking waters? A source confirms that, most of these youths were belonging to a particular political party. Police could not dare to stop them... 

-Many of the troops of Bangladesh Riffles, joining the killer atrocity were appearing before the electronic media [television channels] without hiding their faces with musk much ahead of announcement of the general amnesty by the Prime Minister. In this case, the natural question knocking minds of everyone is, as to whether they were already sure of the amnesty...

-Some of the killer troops were chanting political slogan of a particular political party while giving interview to the media. Moreover, many of them were terming the Prime Minister as ‘Amader Netri’ [Our Leader]. ..

-most of the killers were able to flee the BDR headquarters right after announcement of amnesty by the Prime Minister. Government did not allow Bangladesh Army to approach the place of occurrence.


FULL TEXT



Although members of media in Bangladesh and elsewhere were initially confused in giving the correct name to what happened during February 25-26 inside the Bangladesh Riffles headquarters at Pilkhana in Dhaka. Some said, it is mutiny, some said otherwise. But, as the information of the entire episode is gradually getting public, it is becoming crystal clear that the entire episode was pre-planned murder of the officers of Bangladesh army. To understand the conspiracy behind, we have to evaluate some facts as well some statements of several politicians and so-called intellectuals of this country. Let us carefully go through some of the important points chronologically:

It is already learnt from various statements of the survived officers that, red and yellow color bandana and masks were already dumped inside the toilet adjacent to Darbar Hall much ahead of the incident. This has been disclosed also by survived officer Major Monir in an interview with a vernacular daily on March 1, 2009. The very first question is how this was done secretly? Moreover, this evidently shows that, the conspirators were prepared for the brutal murder and atrocities already. 

In a press briefing at the Army Headquarters on Saturday evening, Major Ishtiaq told reporters that arms and ammunitions entered the Bangladesh Riffles headquarters minutes after some derailed troops started expressing anger, in a grey color pick up [which he said, was not belonging to BDR]. How a van containing steel boxes loaded with arms and ammunitions managed to come up to the BDR headquarters? It is well understood that there was a coordinated timing amongst the killers and the conspirators. Moreover, this statement of Major Ishtiaq proves that, outside elements were involved in this brutal massacre. 

Right after the general election on December 29, 2008, a large number of leaders belonging to political parties, such as Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir, Moudud Ahmed, Suranjit Sen Gupta, Mirza Abbas, Salauddin Quader Chowdhury, Abdul Jalil, Liakot Sikder, Jahangir Kabir Nanak, Mirza Azam, Sajeda Chowdhury, Khondokar Delwar Hossain, Brigadier [Retired] Hannan Shah etc., were continuing a campaign against Bangladesh Army with abusive words in various interviews and television talk shows. They were demanding ‘stern’ actions against a number of army officers and were even demanding all party effort in stopping the army to be able to ‘establish unelected government’. Some so-called intellectuals, mostly belonging to leftist ideology were continuing campaign against Bangladesh Army since the general election of December 29.

Right after the outburst of the brutality inside the BDR headquarters, the director general of Bangladesh Riffles, Major General Shakil Ahmed Choudhury reportedly spoke to the chief executive of the country over cell phone and notified of the incident. Earlier he tried to speak to the chief executive when one retired General working with the chief executive, was contacted over cell telephonic by another attacked officer of Bangladesh Army. Understanding the degree of danger, what actions the chief executive initiated immediately is yet to be known by the people of Bangladesh. The government sent two very junior leaders and controversial figures like Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza Azam, almost a couple of hours after the brutality started. They were also wasting time in the name of making appeals to the killers through hand mikes. There was no sign of minimum wariness in the faces of both the leaders. They were rather calm! Moreover, when both were ‘allowed’ to enter the BDR headquarters, the killers were ready to send a 14-member delegation with them almost in less than 30 minutes. When the team went to meet the Prime Minister, possibly the policymakers were already able to get information on the murder of several officers at the early hours of the brutality, right from the delegation of killers. Although they spent 4 hours in listening to what Jahangir Kabir Nanak described, “emotional appeals of the troops”, why none had ever put focus on pressing the killer delegation to communicate a message to BDR headquarters in stopping further brutality?

Colonel Gulzar Hossain, who is considered to be a hero of combating Islamist militancy in Bangladesh and nabbing dozens of Islamist militants and their kingpins, was also one of the victims of massacre inside the BDR headquarters. According to various reports, Colonel Gulzar was alive even till Wednesday evening. It is believed that he might have been murdered by the killer, hours after announcement of amnesty by the Prime Minister. It is worth mentioning here, one of the two negotiators sent by the government is Mirza Azam, MP, who belongs to the ruling party. Executed kingpin of Islamist Militancy, named Jamaatul Mujahedin Bangladesh [JMB], Shaikh Abdur Rahman is the brother-in-law of Mirza Azam. There is although no clue if Colonel Gulzar was the subject of revenge. After the prolonged ‘meeting’ with the Prime Minister, the killer representatives, led by Deputy Assistant Director of BDR, Towhid, were allowed to waste further time in the name of speaking to the reporters. Was it important for the government to let such crucial time be wasted by facing the media or it was important to rush to the spot and resolve the crisis?

Jahangir Kabir Nanak told the reporters that the Prime Minister has accorded general amnesty to the ‘mutineers’ as well they [the so-called mutineers] agreed to surrender arms forthwith. But, in reality, it never happened. In this case again, why the government was ready to let the killers continue brutality and anti army campaign by using some questioned media?

According to reports, electricity inside the premises of brutality was snatched by someone. Why the government allowed letting the area remain in dark? It was reported in the press [along with some photographs] that dozens of youths were chanting slogans in favor of the killers and they even approached close to the main gate of the BDR headquarters. Some of these youths were even supplying drinking water to the killers. Here is another question.. Police was basically cordoning the entire area and was not allowing any civilian in entering the spot. In this case, how these youths were allowed to enter, chant slogan and even supply drinking waters? A source confirms that, most of these youths were belonging to a particular political party. Police could not dare to stop them. My readers will possibly realize their political background. 

Many of the troops of Bangladesh Riffles, joining the killer atrocity were appearing before the electronic media [television channels] without hiding their faces with musk much ahead of announcement of the general amnesty by the Prime Minister. In this case, the natural question knocking minds of everyone is, as to whether they were already sure of the amnesty. Who gave such advanced assurance?Some of the killer troops were chanting political slogan of a particular political party while giving interview to the media. Moreover, many of them were terming the Prime Minister as ‘Amader Netri’ [Our Leader]. It is learnt that most of the killers were able to flee the BDR headquarters right after announcement of amnesty by the Prime Minister. Government did not allow Bangladesh Army to approach the place of occurrence.

BDR Massacre: Killers fleeing to Saudi Arabia

Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:51:03 +0600
Subject: BDR Massacre: Killers fleeing to Saudi Arabia
From: Human Rights Forum
To: "H.E.Prince Saud Al-Faisal"
Cc: BDEMB@mofa.gov.sa


BDR Massacre: Killers fleeing to Saudi Arabia

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury

According to a report published in Dhaka’s leading vernacular daily Manabzamin, four killer Bangladesh Riffles [BDR] men fled the country on March 2, 2009 by Biman Bangladesh Airlines flight number BG-049 to Saudi Arabia. With the help of a very influential quarter in the government, not only the flight was delayed for two hours, but the killer BDR men were boarded on the aircraft through a special passage of the boarding bridge, minutes before the flight.

Members of the intelligence agencies arrested another BDR troop named Rafiqul Islam, when he was also attempting to flee to Saudi Arabia on Wednesday. Rafiqul was trying to leave the country by Saudia, Saudi Arabian Airlines flight number SB-801 in the noon.

It is further learnt that, some influential quarters managed safe exit of these killers to a number of foreign destination right after the brutal massacre ended at the Bangladesh Riffles headquarters. Passports and visas of a number of killers were arranged in advanced prior to staging of the brutal massacre. Photographs and other details of the fugitives will also be put online on the websites of Rapid Action Battalion and Bangladesh Police, a source said.

Meanwhile, people in the know have been requested to inform the Army Headquarters control room, apart from the nearest police station, about the runaway BDR rebels from the Bangladesh Rifles headquarters and different camps.

“Confidentiality of the informers will be protected,” said an ISPR release issuing the public notice on Wednesday when a countrywide drive code-named 'operation rebel hunt' for rounding up the mutineers is already underway. 

The contact numbers of the Army Headquarters control room are: [880-2] 8712197, [880] 01713333 256.

It is further learnt that investigating agencies are trying to publish the photographs of the absconding BDR men and suspected killers.

US Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI] has agreed to help Bangladesh in forensic investigation into the BDR carnage. 

Acting Deputy State Department spokesman Gordon Duguid told a regular press briefing in Washington Tuesday that they have received a request from the Bangladesh government for the FBI help in forensic investigation. 

“I believe the FBI has agreed to do that,” Duguid told a correspondent. He, however, could not give further details about when, where and how the FBI will work. 

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina sought the FBI assistance during telephone conversation with US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Richard Boucher on March 1. Boucher spoke on behalf of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and offered the US assistance.

In another development, the Bogra unit of RAB-12 arrested Azizar Rahman Nannu, father of rebel BDR soldier Abdur Rahman Nilu, and seized goods worth TK 1.2 million including TK 300,000 in cash, ornaments and other valuables which were robbed from the officers’ residences in the BDR headquarters. RAB arrested him, after receiving secret information, at Chalitabari and seized the valuables and money which were buried. 

Nilu on February 26 called in his father Nannu, 60, to his rented house at Hazaribagh in Dhaka and handed over TK 300,000 in cash, gold ornaments, a Siemens mobile set, a wrist watch and a bottle of shampoo, said RAB sources.

A team of RAB-12, led by Major Abu Nasar Mohammad Mostafa, conducted a drive at Bidupara village of Lahiripara union at 4am on Wednesday after getting secret information. Nannu was nabbed in Chalitabari, a nearby village.

Nannu confessed the truth during primary interrogation. Acting on the information provided by him, the team recovered a sack full of valuables and money that was buried in a rice-field at Chalitabari, said sources.

Nannu, said his son on Saturday called him to his house at Hazaribagh and gave him the sack in the presence of another soldier, Jahangir, and told hip to keep it carefully. He, however, claimed he did not know anything about the things inside the sack. 

Major Mostafa said that Nannu knew about the money. He will be sent to the BDR headquarters as the incident took place there. He also informed reporters that the six bundles of TK 500 notes were withdrawn on February 10 from the Trust Bank’s principal branch and Sonali Bank of Dhaka.

Meanwhile, according to reports, it was learnt that, during the 2-day long massacre inside the BDR headquarters, at least 500 Arges grenades and a large number of arms and ammunitions disappeared from the place of occurance. Security experts fear that disappreared grenades and arms would remain as a potential threat to country’s law and order situation.

The police on Wednesday recovered two live grenades from a toilet of outpatient department of Rangpur Medical College Hospital.

In another incident, grenade explosion on the premises of Chapainawabganj police station left a police inspector’s son dead and two other children injured on Wednesday noon.

The police said three children, two of them sons of two assistant sub inspectors, were injured as a bomb went off inside the boundary of the police station in the district headquarters at about 12:45pm.

‘A bomb exploded with a big bang when the children were playing behind the police barracks,’ said a police officer. The injured — Al Amin, 10, son of ASI [Assistant Sub Inspector] Ataur Rahman, Mamun, 7, son of ASI Rafique, and Mehedi, 10, son of cook of thana mess Khodeza — were taken to Sadar Hospital. They were shifted to Rajshahi Medical College Hospital with critical condition. Al Amin died at RMCH at about 6:30 pm on Wednesday, the sources said.

Political and defense analysts in Bangladesh believe it is of crucial importance in the interest of the nation that the February 25-26 massacre by troops against officers at the Bangladesh Rifles headquarters in the capital Dhaka and the concomitant carnage are thoroughly investigated, and the perpetrators and their instigators, if any, identified, arrested, prosecuted and punished. Such actions are needed to put all Bangladesh defense forces, military and paramilitary, on a stronger footing, which is very important for a nation state to thrive on in the international state system.

More mysteries related to February Massacre in Bangladesh

More mysteries related to February Massacre in Bangladesh
Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury 
March 03, 2009

Two Chinese nationals, named Tang Yunpeng, 30, and Xang Zhaoua, 28, came out of the BDR Headquarters in the afternoon on February 26 after the bloody massacre which started on February 25. It is a great mystery as to what these foreign nationals were doing inside the headquarters of the paramillitary forces of Bangladesh. 

Recovery of two binoculars and the belts of SMGs confuses the army and others investigators as these are used neither by the Bangladesh Army and BDR nor by any other government agencies. The investigators are also having a strong question as to what police was doing since they entered the premises on evening of February 26, 2009 and a number of influential figures in the government, including Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza Azam as well the Home Minister were frequently visiting the place. From various sources it is although confirmed that, in the name of keeping army away from the BDR headauqarters, mutineers and killers were allowed with a safe exit point to flee. But, it is still a mystery as to why the government allowed these elements to flee as well as what the influential members of the government were doing inside the dark BDR headquarters.

It is learnt by the investigators that several killers during the mutiny were having contacts with a number of influential leaders belonging to political parties. Tapes of all such telephonic conversation and SMS text messages are being collected by the intelligence agencies. Members of intelligence agencies are also keeping close eyes on the movement of some of the suspected figures, who had hands behind such notoriety in the Bangladesh Riffles headquarters.

Investigators are also considering one very specific point of sending of fax messages from the BDR headquarters by a lieutenant colonel of Bangladesh Army who was released from the place of occurrence almost 30 hours later. Copies of such facsimile communication is already in the hands of the investigators.

The investigators are also scrutinizing the reason of extreme worried faces of Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza Azam during the parliament session on March 1, 2009, when a Condolence Bill was moved in the house. Such extreme worriness of these two questioned leaders of the ruling party even could not ignore the attention of television camera, which was live broadcasting the parliament session. It may be mentioned here that, Mirza Azam is the brother-in-law of executed Islamist militancy kingpin Shaikh Abdur Rahman.

Meanwhile, some of the figures in the ruling party, whose names are already included in the list of suspects expressed grave concern at the beginning of ´Operation Rebel Hunt´ by the members of Bangladesh Armed Forces from Monday. At the requests of such elements, the matter was raised during the cabinet meeting on the same day and the Prime Minister instructed her Principal Staff Officer to communicate a message that, during the Operation Rebel Hunt, only members of the rebel Bangladesh Riffles troops can be arrested. Others [even if suspected in the case], cannot be arrested by the members of Bangladesh Armed Forces.

In another move, the government has assigned assistant superintendent of police in CID [Criminal Investigation Department], Abdul Kahhar Akhand as the investigation officer of the BDR Massacre Case, which was lodged with a local police station. 

Although an ASP in designation, Kahhar Akhand keeps direct contact with the Prime Minister and Home Minister. As soon as he joined CID after getting back job, government became busy in arranging a new luxurious jeep for him along with all other facilities to let others in CID realize that, he [Kahhar] belongs to Awami League. ..

Now, again, the very controversial and questioned police officer like Abdul Kahhar Akhand, who had already been questioned of his efficiency and expertise by the higher judiciary of Bangladesh, has been appointed as the Investigation Officer [IO] of the very sensitive and important BDR Massacre case. 

Experts commenting on appointment of ASP Abdul Kahhar Akhand as the IO of BDR Massacre said, this might have been done intentionally by some of the policy makers of the government with the ulterior motive of putting the entire issue into suppression. 

The also believe that, government will try its best in either interfering or misguiding the investigation or would obtain an investigation report from Kahhar Akhand to match the taste of ruling party supremos.

For Kahhar Akhand, to be the investigation officer of the case is a mere opportunity as he is also lobbying strongly for a promotion in near future.

Crime experts are opinion that, a high powered investigation committee should be formed with the Inspector General of Police [who lots his son-in-law in the massacre] to investigate the case lodged with the police station and questioned people like Akhand should be immediately removed from the process. 


Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury 

In today's world, Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury is perhaps the most quoted Bangladeshi journalist in the international media. The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Sun, The Washington Times, The Australian, The Berliner Zeitung, The Jewish State, The Jewish Week, The Guardian and many other leading international and regional dailies and periodicals have published numerous editorials on Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury.